this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
354 points (99.7% liked)

Canada

10390 readers
594 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

Barnes is challenging the case on constitutional grounds, arguing her right to freedom of expression through gardening is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

She says her garden supports pollinators, biodiversity and wildlife, reflecting her environmental and spiritual beliefs. She appeared for a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday and is scheduled for a two-day trial in November, according to her lawyer, Vilko Zbogar.

Zbogar says the case is about more than the fine. “Courts have recognized since at least 1996 that freedom of expression under the Charter protects natural gardens as expressions of profound environmental values,” he said. “For Karen, it’s also a spiritual exercise — tied to her creed and beliefs. This falls under Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter: freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.”

Experts say naturalized gardens and meadows can attract far more pollinators than regularly mown lawns, while also using less water and improving soil health.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wonder how much this fruitless battle is costing taxpayers.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Only slightly less than the 400,000 they’re seeking in “damages” ffs.

People need to get ousted for allowing this insanity

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately many tax payers will support it, because non-standard property appearance drags down property values. Or people just get their panties twisted by stuff. Some of my city's aldermen are trying to make it illegal to grow corn (technically "vegetable gardens over six feet tall") in city limits because they have gotten so many complaints from neighbors. Having a food plant visible near a residence? The horror!

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Corn is a garbage crop to grow at home. The height thing is kina dumb, because they probably wouldn't bat an eye about sunflowers and roses up on a trellis. But corn basically robs all the nutrients in the gardens soil incredibly fast, starving the other crops. Also as produce corn is the cheapest and most abundant staple and to grow a some what substantial amount you gota give up a significant portion of your garden.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

There is a house a few blocks from me that, due to the shape of their property, has no backyard, it's all front. They have maybe fifteen young chestnut trees (bloomed for the first time this spring, but don't seem to have set), hazelnut bushes between all the trees, and maybe a ten foot by six foot bed of corn. I think other stuff, too, but those are the eye catching things.

I have no idea what they think they are going to do with all those nuts once the trees and bushes start producing, or whether they are growing some interesting variety of corn or just find it entertaining to grow a supermarket variety themselves, but it's their property and I feel like they should be able to do what they want (garbage crops included) without the city getting up in their business.