this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)

Programming

22502 readers
268 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Software design is weird. I wrote this article about implementing a minimal kanban board and the trade-offs I needed to make.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fd93@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Yep - I do it in the scripted version.

The main challenge is dealing with dynamic data in a way that won't mess up merge conflicts. Sort order is the main one and it's pretty bad because a merge conflict will result in multiple tickets with the same sort order. The best way I could think of in the slightly less strict paradigm of the plainban project was to keep a data.yml file for each column which records the sort order of tickets by storing them as a list of uuids and making their name a comment. That way it's very easy to keep track of the order of tickets on merge conflict in a way that's not possible in a central data source like a csv file.

sort_order:
    - abcd # my cool ticket
    - 1234 # another cool ticket
    - ab12 # final ticket

Will change current, less merge-friendly implementation to this when I get to it.