1768
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
1768 points (99.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
9109 readers
2186 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The original plan for ACA had a single-payer option.
The compromised ACA itself passed the house only by a couple votes. The party is not a monolith and had a number of moderates that opposed single-payer.
Like hell it did.
The version they always intended to pass.
They expect the voters to vote as a bloc but won't do so themselves.
No matter how big a majority democrats have, they always find just enough no votes.
It's Manchin, straight up. And then Ted Kennedy died and they lost the supermajority and had to pass what the Senate had already voted on because anything different would be filibustered.
It was lieberman and nelson. manchin hadn't rotated in yet.
You're right, and let's not forget the Franken recount that lasted until June. So a very brief window to get stuff done.
They could have completely done away with the filibuster forever with only 50.
I will never accept the "we need 60 to get anything done" excuse. It just means "we don't want to do anything."
I don't really buy that. Even the Rs haven't gone that far. Imagine how much worse things could be if they had.
You're arguing against well-known historical fact. You have a lot of emotional angst getting in the way of your judgment and understanding of nuance.
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/obama-shying-away-public-option-or-not
The public option was not single payer. It also was never meant to be in the final bill. It was the bargaining chip they were dangling to negotiate with the republicans. When the republicans showed themselves to be unmoveable, they had to get Lieberman to play the part to get rid of it.
Your article doesn't back up your ridiculous lie that single payer was the original plan for the ACA.
Also, gaslighting is abuse, and it's no surprise that the republican-adjacent wing of the party resorts to it so quickly.