News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Edit
Ah fuck it I'm out.
I bet on “we learned to diagnose skin cancer”.
This is absolutely a large part of it.
Shut your armchair misinformation ass up.
In the 70s Denmark didn’t have dermoscopy, digital mole mapping, or modern melanoma drugs... Early cases were often missed and late cases were basically untreatable, so pretending diagnosis and treatment were ‘just fine’ back then is pure revisionist nonsense.
Already had you tagged as 'fuckstick.' looks like it wasn't a one-off.
i had a derm once at kaiser check my nevus spilus once, because it was growing in size and adding more spots. melanoma doesnt always have to be a sun-caused mole. but it could be a plain flat brown staining too.
Because you're spreading healthcare misinformation that could literally get someone killed.
Here's where I block you because I don't want to be in a community with people that remind me of RFK Jr.
No I'm not, where is the risk of getting killed when I CLEARLY warn against getting sunburn, which is the main cause for skin cancer!! And is the exclusive reason sunscreen is beneficial from a health standpoint and recommended by dermatologists.
Dermatologists do not recommend sun screen to stay longer in the sun, they recommend it to avoid sunburn.
It's always the sign of the bad faith arguer to throw decorum and impropriety at their opponent whenever they refuse to tolerate absolute clear and objective bullshit.
You don't get to play a victim here. You are spreading misinformation and you know it. Or you don't and that just makes you a willing dupe.
So no, I think his response was well with the polite decorum afforded a peddler of dogshit. An idiot trying to take everyone else down with them.
The time for tolerating bullshit alternative science peddlers is over.
You can go fuck a duck. I'm exhausted by people like you over the years. You want to feel special, like you know something more than everyone else and this somehow gives you permission to challenge established data and science with you "opinions".
Fuck all the way off. The time for a concerted public backlash against people like you is at hand. I'm so fucking tired of idiots feeling like they deserve equal time with experts.
This is how everyone needs to learn to start handling these shitheads.
Hey im stealing this as a blanket copy pasta for the next one of yhe idiots i come across, thanks
😆🫵
Was skin cancer rare? Or were skin cancer diagnoses rare? I worry that you may be presenting the same flawed arguments that we see used to promote claims of an "autism epidemic".
Aussie paper for the interested.
This is why the 80's were full of slip slop slap
RFK Jr logic.
Perhaps, its still worth bringing up here that you're supposed to reapply as needed.
Is it possible that we get less natural UV protection from the atmosphere now? I’m just making a wild guess but we’ve had so many environmental changes and climate change has made summers so much more severe.
Yeah, that was one of the things with the cfcs causing damage to the ozone layer. I would also say a lot more pollution (including microplastics) just generally everywhere, clothing showing off more skin, and that smoking isnt causing other things first.
The ozone layer is generally back in place because that was like the last time an industry agreed to cease its harmful climate change inducing behaviors.
They agreed because cheaper, better options became available.
It isn't actually. It stopped getting worse and is very slowly recovering. The hole is still mostly there and many parts of the ozone layer are still thinner.
All that and he still couldn't gracefully take the L...
well I was about to engage with you, but now you've deleted everything!