this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
256 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

41426 readers
561 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can understand why governments would push for something like this after 9/11, though it of course goes without saying that this is a totally unacceptable violation of someone's basic rights. It also goes without saying that governments always want more control over their citizens, but what exactly are they so worried might happen, right now, in 2025 or the near future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I feel it's the same vibe with return to office policy in Canada.

These things seem like they come from absolutely no where with no legitimate reason and then all of these executives are on board making it happen.

Like what the fuck is going on

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's all rigged, we are cattle

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

We always use to like say it but holy fuck it seems like a whole new thing. The way these things spread it is freaky.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If you're talking about Toronto and Ottawa, as far as I heard, a huge part of the reason is Downtown businesses are struggling now that way fewer people are commuting Downtown.

But the solution to this is not RTO. If your DOWNTOWN of all places isn't self sufficient I don't know what to tell you other than your municipal policies are failing. Just let people live in the office buildings. "Oh they're too wide and you'll have to make the units narrow strips that only have a tiny sliver of window on one side" Do that then. Tons of people would still live in those because Downtown should be the most desirable place to live.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok so how exactly have all these companies all agreed to do this at the same time. That's not strange to you?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In the worlds of the immortal George Carlin: it's a big club, and you ain't in it.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t want to just dismiss this as “business as usual.” What stands out to me is how coordinated the return-to-work push was. Sure, we know there’s a “big club” of elites who share similar goals. But sharing goals isn’t the same as acting in lockstep.

Think about it: I can join a fitness club, but that doesn’t mean all of us show up on Wednesday wearing the same outfit. There’s a difference between belonging to a group and receiving instructions that lead everyone to move together.

That’s why I think this deserves more attention. The inference here isn’t just that the wealthy share values or face the same incentives it’s that they communicate and coordinate globally in ways that go far beyond coincidence. And that, to me, is a much bigger story than just “rich people doing rich people stuff.”

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you think the ultra wealthy don't associate and communicate with each other? Why wouldn't there be private Signal chats composed only of billionaires? It's not about shared incentives. The "club" part is very literal.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's kind of crazy to me how you're casual with this. First I don't think it's a signal chat. What it is though is definitely something we should be talking about. This is Bilderberg type collusion but on a level we can see literally

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

“Oh they’re too wide and you’ll have to make the units narrow strips that only have a tiny sliver of window on one side” Do that then.

Some people would be willing to live like that. But the rents per ft^2 or m^2 would be abysmally low. And renovating the buildings would still be very expensive. It may be physically possible to turn those deep floor plate cube farm skyscrapers into housing, but it isn't financially possible. The money would be better spent tearing the buildings down entirely and just building entirely new residential buildings from scratch.

[–] zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Just let people live in the office buildings

Yes 👍