this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
276 points (95.4% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2602 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when 'Steamboat Willie' enters the public domain

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] calavera@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Copyright should be abolished.

Completely agree, not just copyrights but patents too.

Open environments are way more productive and creative then lock stuff for decades.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Patents were invented to make things more open. Before patents, companies and people relied on trade secrets. They would go out of their way to hide how everything worked. At least with a patent things needed to be in the open and eventually became public domain.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Open environments are way more productive and creative then lock stuff for decades.

Source?

The idea of copyright and patents is to ensure that you can get compensated for your own work. There’s no point in creating a unique idea when Disney can just copy it and take all the money for themselves.

There are flaws with how copyright and patents are implemented, but that doesn’t mean they’re fundamentally broken. The alternative would be much worse.

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You should look at how creative commons works. It's the best alternative imo

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

CC is a great alternative for some cases, but far from all. Most artists want to protect their work, and CC don’t help with that.

How much Creative Commons media do you consume?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I find copyright and patents very different, at least in the U.S. I support copyright, but not patents. Patents are used to stifle creativity and generate lawsuits.

Example, I designed something and was urged to patent it. It combines hardware, electronics, and in some iterations software as well. I released it copyleft instead. People make it in their garage, cottage industry sells it, a multinational profits from it.

The current designs are much better than my original. If I had patented it it might stagnate, or I could litigate and try to prevent innovation.

[–] calavera@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Look at Linux and open source projects as a whole, like Lemmy, or how 3D printer community flourished after some 80s patents lost their validity and so on...

Disney can just copy it

They are the ones who most profit from this CR and patent scheme, if they would profit from open projects they would lobby in that direction not the other way around

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So sounds like we should be arguing to abolish the need for employment to survive instead of defending the status quo.

[–] calavera@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

Who would make the stuff that you buy and consume?

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The cynic in me would argue Capitalism is the problem here.