this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1235 points (96.9% liked)

interestingasfuck

8010 readers
7 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nihilomaster@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I can only assume that this has to do with international law. Copyright is pretty well protected and has a huge lobby behind it. Whereas nobody actually seems to care about privacy.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

More like they want to push copyright enforcement/expansion by using something people care about. Similar to "think of the children".

They did try to push copyright as a solution to revenge porn, in effect pushing a private alternative justice system based on DMCAs and payment processor blackmail.

We should get bespoke laws to deal with deepfake problems.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Copyright is pretty well protected

Meanwhile Facebook downloaded Anna's Archive without any problem.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You might think that, but try using Google's Street View in Germany. Almost the entire country is unavailable due to their privacy laws.

[–] wdx@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

that was the case a couple years back. Germany is now pretty well-covered by Street View

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Ok, I haven't really looked in years. Did they change the privacy laws, or did Google just change how it was collecting pictures?