this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
365 points (99.5% liked)

PC Gaming

12185 readers
238 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So when dealing with volume purchases via a secondary store front (as established in the article) doesn't need any kind of intercession from Steam or another processor to deal with any and all purchases? It's all completely autonomous with no intervention needed by anyone at all?

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as merchant doesn't need to convert from crypto to regular currency, no third party is involved in the transaction, it's a direct P2P system - in other words - perfect digital cash

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you just need to say "I give this person .001 bitcoin" and they magically get it? That's wild to me.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you take their address, sign a message with your private key saying .001 bitcoin goes there and propagate it over the network. But in very simple terms yep, bitcoins magically land on their address. Whole thing sustains itself on economic incentives and cryptography, without any central authority

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So there is a network and backbone to it. And you need to do something more than "I give this person a bitcoins for my game" especially when working through a separate storefront. Both to ensure that the person receives their game and you receive their currency.

The problem with current transactions isn't the money itself, it's the services that use that currency.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

So there is a network and backbone to it.

Yes, Bitcoin is not a currency, it's an open permissionless network of trust secured not by access right managment and opacity but game theory and past energy. Very useful to build currencies. I recommend you Andreas Antonopoulos work, his content age very well and everything is under CreativeCommons. A great video to start is : What is Bitcoin and why does it matters?

The problem with current transactions isn't the money itself, it's the services that use that currency.

It really depend where you live. For Venezualian, Lebanese, Turkish and many more people there is huge problem with their currencies and banking services. Also in Africa many ex-french colonies are forced to use Franc CFA which is basically an economic-leash by the french government. We can debate on the many issues with the USD currency but these are little (for now at least) compared to others.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So there is a network and backbone to it

Yes, it's a permissionless P2P network.

And you need to do something more than "I give this person a bitcoins for my game"

Signing and sending transaction is exactly it. Transaction says that you send your bitcoins to an address controlled by the other person.

especially when working through a separate storefront. Both to ensure that the person receives their game and you receive their currency.

Crypto doesn't ensure you get the product. Like with real cash, other party might just run away with money

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Crypto doesn’t ensure you get the product. Like with real cash, other party might just run away with money

Which is why intermediaries exist and why crypto isn't in any way a solution for the problem this entire post is about. And why bringing it up randomly is complete tech bro wankery.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you concerned that Valve runs away with your money?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

Valve? Not concerned. Random company selling something I need for a good price? Sure.

The intermediaries are useful when dealing with less trustworthy merchants.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

You know you can build an escrow out of a smart-contract (even on Bitcoin) using multi-sig to ensure both parties are satisfied ?

[–] slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, simply put, that's how it works. You should read the whitepaper: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

The first sentence:

A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution