Technology

59597 readers

4514 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

183

Apple responds to the Beeper iMessage saga: ‘We took steps to protect our users’ (www.theverge.com)

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apple responds to the Beeper iMessage saga: ‘We took steps to protect our users’::Beeper, like Sunbird and Texts, sought to find a way to bring iMessage to Android users. Its app, Beeper Mini, worked well. But a few days after it launched, Apple took steps to shut it down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The latter article doesn't cite decreasing contrast ratios, but notes

[Apple's] guidelines state that you should strive for a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 between the text and background colors. Apple’s white text in a blue bubble (iPhone messages) shows a 3.5:1 contrast ratio, while the white text in a green bubble (non-iPhone messages) manages only a 2.1:1 contrast ratio, less than half the recommended minimum contrast

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I saw that, but that doesn’t state what the other person is stating.

We can ascertain no intent but they assert one as malice which is why I pressed their claim.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you deduce that Apple did that by accident and never noticed?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

With no evidence to tell me they did it deliberately I can’t deduce anything, I could jump to conclusions or make assumptions.

I’m not really in the business of that here though, someone made a claim and said there were articles about it then produced two articles which didn’t support their claims at all.

It’s a lot easier to believe they did something then just didn’t give two fucks about fixing it since the colors had become ubiquitous than to believe they deliberately did it to get back at people with a handicap to drive them to use their phones, especially when iMessage itself doesn’t follow the guideline.

Again, all I really care about in this thread is that someone who made bogus assertions about intent was unable to support it at all.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, Apple never looked over this interface detail. I'm sure they just never noticed.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

See here you are just speaking your bias, did you not read what I said or is your intent to just twist my words so you can respond with your narrative?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, you're right. I'm going to go sit in the corner and pray. I'm sure Apple overlooked this detail because they're just not really aware of basic attributes of one of their most widely used apps.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Again you keep deciding on intent when the easiest answer is “we chose this color and we don’t fucking care that it violated our standards because at this point we’re not changing it” which would explain why the iMessage colors also don’t meet their guidelines unless you’re implying that they are also harming iMessage users in the same way?