this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
362 points (97.6% liked)
Open Source
40159 readers
32 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know this won't go over well here but I don't really care that Obsidian isn't FOSS, because it's just a frontend for markdown files in folders. There's no lock-in whatsoever, and it being FOSS or not makes no functional difference.
That's fair, but as someone who likes to contribute to FOSS projects with features that I want, I'd like every tool I use to be FOSS, so I can make them work exactly the way I want them to, while also providing something to those that don't want to/can't pay for a tool like this, or just don't want to have the inevitablity of having spent hundreds of hours getting used to a tool, only for the owning company to make it unusable for you.
In FOSS projects, if a project starts to go a route you don't like, you can ignore all future updates and still get the exact experience you wanted.
I broadly agree with you, but I would still prefer to have another option so that if/when Obsidian goes the Notion route, I have another option to jump to easily.
Me too, but I figure a clone will pop up very quickly if that happens, and I'll already have an easily portable folder with markdown files.
My big concern is that, since there's no substantial Obsidian competitor now, there must not be any money in it, which would slow down the arrival of a new clone if Obsidian ever platform-decay'd. Yes, the fact that it's easily portable is a good bulwark, and that's why I currently use Obsidian; but to make a comparison, it's been twelve years since Google Reader died, and there isn't yet a successor that I've found which offers both opml & last-read syncing and unlimited feeds, unless you can self-host.
I guess I'm saying, I've been on this ride for too long, I kinda want to get off of it.
The Google Reader comparison is excellent, that one still hurts... I think RSS usage has simply declined tremendously overall though, as opposed to PKM which is still going strong (I think/hope)
I think it's probably still a subculture, like RSS was. I hope both of them have a resurgence, though.