this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10322 readers
617 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Government should be buying those flood prone properties and returning them to parkland. Insuring the inevitable isn't risk management, its foolish.

Don't build in flood plains. The 1000 year flood is the new 100 year flood, so be sure to buy some good hip waders.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

Instead, they’re bypassing environmental assessments

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't I build in a flood plain? You said that you think the government should reward people who build in flood plains by buying their house. How is that going to make people less likely to build in a flood plain.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

No one who has ever had a property expropriated ever called it being rewarded.