this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
321 points (98.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4966 readers
124 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pirat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Probably also due to new bus lines replacing smaller train lines and/or driving passengers to/from the remaining bigger train stations of the lines instead. I guess bus service had lower maintenance and operational costs while being more flexible than a small train or tram.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you have actual numbers that support that for the French bus service replacing their rail? As when that was mooted when Beeching did the same rail cuts to the UK railway lines, the buses for small and unpopular branch lines lasted a year or so before they were also cancelled or massively scaled back

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, no numbers, but I have heard and read that that's the history of the smaller railways in other European countries around that time.