this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
232 points (99.6% liked)

Canada

10430 readers
838 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Now, when we’re at the bargaining table with an obstinate employer, the Liberals are violating our Charter rights to take job action and give Air Canada exactly what they want — hours and hours of unpaid labour from underpaid flight attendants, while the company pulls in sky-high profits and extraordinary executive compensation.”

CUPE came to the table with data-driven and reasonable proposals for a fair cost-of-living wage increase and an end to forced unpaid labour. Air Canada responded by sandbagging the negotiations. The Liberal government is rewarding Air Canada’s refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted.

This sets a terrible precedent. Contrary to the Minister’s remarks, this will not ensure labour peace at Air Canada. This will only ensure that the unresolved issues will continue to worsen by kicking them down the road. Nor will it ensure labour peace in this industry — because unpaid work is an unfair practice that pervades nearly the entire airline sector, and will continue to arise in negotiations between flight attendants and other carriers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why don’t these return to works force companies to take the workers offer?

Seems it would be used less then.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 29 points 1 month ago

The workers aren't the ones ~~bribing~~ lobbying the politicians

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've thought a better idea would be to significantly fine the entire C-suite and board of directors personally for every day a back to work order is in effect. Or, if it's a government entity, crown Corp, or similar, the executive level should be fired as a condition of the back to work order. As much as your idea would be good, it would be better if there wasn't an incentive (real or perceived) for either side to negotiate in bad faith.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

Because the Liberal government is on the side of capital, not the side of workers.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Because corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to maximize profits.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

Fucking leeches.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Do they, though? People often say this, and it's typically a complete lie. Is there a law that actually states this simply and clearly?

But even if it were true, maximizing profits is not guaranteed. Any reasonable policy decision could potentially raise or lower profits, especially if you consider the medium run or the long run. After all, giving the union what they want could lead to better customer service and therefore happier and increased numbers of customers, and therefore increased profits.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Sure ok, I know nothing and you are all knowing. You win the internet today.

Can't put one on you at all. Genius I say, genius.