Privacy

32130 readers

573 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

123

Proton domains blocked as disposable in disposable filter (github.com)

submitted 11 months ago by privacyfighter@discuss.online to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I hope it is a way to solve this…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You’re getting into very sketchy territory by saying a dev who is using a public GitHub repo to solve their problems needs to take it down

No, I don't believe I said any such thing. Since you mention it, though, I think taking this list down and removing the false positives before bringing it back up would be the responsible thing to do.

In the interest of specifics, can you point to where this specific list has done harm?

I know from personal experience and investigation (both as a user and on the admin side) that there are now many cases of privacy-focused email addresses being rejected, or even worse, accepted and then silently black-holed, due to the domains being inappropriately added to lists like this one. I don't know of a place where people report such cases so they can be documented in aggregate, but if I find one, I'll be sure to bookmark it in case your question comes up again in the future.

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you’re lumping this resource into a bucket with other resources that were malicious but you have no direct connection from this resource to harm you claim it causes? You’re saying a dev using this list to allow people to download free content but prune emails to save his bounce rate is doing bad things and needs to convert their FOSS use-case to yours?

Who gets to decide? You didn’t answer that and in the interest of good faith I’ll pull that one down as the important one since it follows from the argument I feel you’re making.

[–] ono@lemmy.ca -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

but you have no direct connection from this resource to harm you claim it causes?

The connection is very clear, because you can see what domains are on the list.

So you’re lumping this resource into a bucket with other resources that were malicious

You’re saying a dev using this list [...] needs to convert their FOSS use-case to yours?

[...] the argument I feel you’re making.

Please stop putting words in my mouth. As you seem to be arguing in bad faith, I'm done with this conversation.

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

You’ve ignored my questions attempting to flesh out your point and refuse to link this specific list to anything bad. I don’t think you understand good or bad faith. Good luck with that!

[–] temporal_edict@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

So this is the list that you used as an admin? Or this is the list that blocked you as a user?