this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
934 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17643 readers
1538 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

same as it can fail on people with very dark skin. No racism or discrimination needed to explain it

That's a classic case of implicit racism. The technology is tailored to perform optimally against lighter toned skin, because the people building and evaluating the software are all lighter skinned, themselves. Similarly, I'm sure, the developers of the technology didn't bother to evaluate how it would work on people with facial skin conditions, markings, or tattoos.

In classic "Move Fast and Break Things" style, they rushed an application to market that only half worked on some people, and then told anyone who would fail the check by default that this was an individual's problem to resolve.

"Who cares if this system works for ?" shows up in all sorts of lowest-bidder crap work, from medical studies to mechanical engineering. Whether its left-handed car drivers get fucked by a right-hand favorable design or clinical trials that just didn't bother including women as subjects or dark-skinned people failing facial recognition, the implicit bigotry of poor engineering is rampant in our modern world.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

do not assume malice when incompetence suffices

Or, in this case, physics. You assume that, where physics is the issue, it must be racism because... Everything is racism, I guess?

Dark skin color reflect less light. Somebody with an extremely dark skinay actually reflect so little light that it's harder to make out details. Could this be adjusted for? Up to certain levels, I'm sure. Should we call everything racist automatically?

Probably not

But

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Dark skin color reflect less light.

Imagine a world in which every picture of a white person came out with them looking olive green.

And imagine the camera company - based out of the ultra-wealth Ethiopian tech sector that holds all the patents on the technology - putting out a PR brief that says "Nothing we can do. Human skin isn't supposed to be that reflective."

Could this be adjusted for?

Yes. But it would require people to acknowledge the problem and care enough to fix it.