Mildly Interesting

22482 readers

243 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

904

2.06 meters tall volleyball player Anna Smrek (1.60m man next to her for scale) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

309 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With an image designed to have sexual appeal, is it wrong to see the sexual appeal?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope, never said it was. I was saying that with such an image, one should expect sexualized comments.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am sorry if I misunderstood you. Would you mind explaining the line about evolving? It seemed to imply to me that there is a possible (better?) future state of things?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

ah yes. Seeing it is fine. Saying what your thinking... not so much. But I wasn't trying to imply that I am more evolved... I am litterally saying that man (and women really) haven't evolved enough to not think about sex and screwing when we see an image like that. And anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves. Some have been trained or learned not to say what they are thinking, but most are thinking it all the same. I am sure there are exceptions of course.