this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
298 points (90.5% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1929 readers
122 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's not fun interacting with them when they often want to engage in ad hominems. This is why I have no interest in the tankie triad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the developer is obviously a bad person but Dessalines simply carried out something resembling a Nuremberg trial rather than a "genocide".

there is no historical evidence of a genocide happening in 1804. the people claiming a "white genocide" happened are white French who would obviously be biased and would want to defend their "human rights" image on the global stage.

this is akin to the binary propaganda that paints October 7 as a "genocide" and Israel's actual genocide of Palestinians as a humanitarian mission to eradicate terrorism.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No he didn't. They killed the guilty and the innocent making no effort to distinguish between them. The soldiers mostly escaped whereas civilians were murdered. In fact most people in Haiti had little stomach for the sort of purge of French women and children he desired to the point where it doesn't happen until he tours a particular settlement.

One can argue all day long he was revenging very legit harms but it doesn't make him less of a monster and his people ultimately agreed and murdered him.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there was no distinction between "civilians" and soldiers because the people he targeted fought in the colonial National Guard. you would've known this if you had read the sources I linked though. from WP:

In a 2005 article titled “Caribbean genocide,” historian Philippe Girard argued that during the first four months of 1804, “on Dessalines’s orders, soldiers rounded up white planters, their families, French soldiers and the urban poor known as petits blancs, and killed them. Neither women nor children were spared.” Drawing heavily on Girard’s claims, podcaster Mike Duncan, in Season 4 of “Revolutions,” offers a sensationalized account of what he calls the “genocidal massacres” of 1804. He alleges that Haitian soldiers raped all the White women and concludes that Dessalines committed a “heinous crime.”

Did Dessalines execute French soldiers and colonists? Yes. But this fact has been exaggerated and taken out of historical context.

When the French evacuated in late 1803, they did not concede defeat. Instead, a small contingent of troops relocated to the city of Santo Domingo and began threatening to reinvade and “annihilate” the Black population. Dessalines soon learned of these plans. He also learned about support among White colonists for the recent French expedition. In this context, he ordered the execution of people who had “taken an active part in the different massacres and assassinations” by the French army. But, rather than targeted executions for the defense of the country, terrified colonists claimed to have witnessed the “massacre” of all the White people.

Historical documents reveal, however, that many White people remained in Haiti after this alleged genocide. For example, a partial census from October 1804 lists more than 600 White people in the district of Gros Morne alone. That same month — after all the White people were allegedly killed — a British captain claimed that 200 White women were in imminent danger of being “massacred” in Cap Haitien.

Claiming that Dessalines targeted civilians is also misleading. Many of those he executed fought in the colonial National Guard — militia units of male planters and merchants — which supported the French military expedition. Such claims also downplay the violence of colonialism. Settlers were enslavers, and as historian Vincent Brown has shown, slavery was war. Anti-colonialism is not genocide.

this rhetoric sounds like the Israeli hasbara painting settlers as innocent civilians when most of them either served in the IDF or are currently reservists.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you massacre non-combatants, women, and children as factually did happen its genocide. The fact that not all jews were killed doesn't negate for instance that the holocaust happened. For every genocide there are apologists. The fact that the french as a people may logically be deemed to be more deserving of reciprocal violence doesn't justify it because violence is done to individuals by individuals. They could have forcibly relocated the people or allowed them to be re-located especially the old, women, and children. They broadly committed mass murder. The fact that the french did much worse doesn't make those immoral acts moral.

Anti-colonialism is not genocide

Genocide is genocide.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

When you massacre non-combatants, women, and children as factually did happen its genocide

this is word for word what the French did to Haitians. that was the only genocide that ever happened during the Haitian Revolution. implying that racism against white colonizers is possible or if you're a white supremacist claiming that resisting a Holocaust is akin to committing genocide is a genocide denier's talking point.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Of course racism is possible vs anyone it's simply a word for pre judgement based on race. If Animus is based on what is actually happening right now it's arguably not racism it's simply a correct judgment call. The French as a group were at war with the Haitians but you still can't morally slaughter non combatants.

I hate the attempt to remove a definition of the word racism from the dictionary and replace its definition with something closer to systemic racism or oppression.

What word then means prejudgements based on race?

Of course the oppressed can't oppress the oppressor but anyone can prejudge based on race which has been a valid definition of racism for a very long time.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The Frenchs behavior was abhorrent but this doesn't absolve anyone from the requirement to be moral themselves.

Murdering women and children isn't resisting genocide it's just plain old genocide same as if we had put German civilians into their own ovens after ww2.

Were those civilians complicit. Largely I feel that the answer is yes. But we are required to be moral ourselves even when faced with immorality.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

show us the sources where he ordered French women and children purged

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Show me the sources for where Hitler ordered the holocaust. You can. I can. But I think if you need them it might not be worth my time to bother. This genocide happened.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so you have jack-shit to show for it, got it. really makes your position extremely credible lmao

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You could literally read the Wikipedia entry

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago

What kind of sources do you expect from 200 years ago?