this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13974 readers
710 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 32 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Weird, I’m not seeing that passage in the article. Maybe they edited it out.

Anyway, I was under the impression that the biggest culprit in microplastics in the environment is plastics woven into clothing, yet there’s no mention of avoiding those here.

[–] cattywampas@midwest.social 26 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Tires and clothing. I buy natural fibers exclusively now if I can, but there are no non-microplastic creating options for tires.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

The creation of tire rubber was literally one of the first known carbon polymerization processes, and the nature of wear on tires means that micro-plastics are an absolutely unavoidable aspect of their use.

[–] boiledfrog@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago

Also car tires

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago

This is correct. Your average plastic packaging for food has a silicone layer on it that prevents the vast majority of microplastic transfer.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 14 points 4 weeks ago

I think it's tires.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's still there for me.

---

Edit. Maybe it's a slow(-ish) roll out and not everybody sees the same thing.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 7 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe the algorithm decided I’m not worthy to see that part of the article.