this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
155 points (87.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8398 readers
140 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It could also just be that it's MTG's bill and she's introducing it because she's explicitly antisemitic. It's like if a well-known white supremacist introduced articles of impeachment for Clarence Thomas because they can't stand having a black man on the court. Maybe if this is the one shot that can get it done you bite the bullet and do it because the result is worthwhile even if you're going to get asked why you teamed up with the white supremacist, but for a doomed bill that's only going to be a statement of principles, the benefit is limited and the person who introduced it is part of the statement.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know what point you're trying to make here.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If the personality of the person intruducing an amendement matters then AOC would never vote with any Republican, right?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

MTG's problematic aspect isn't her being a Republican. It's not even that she's a particularly bad person (she is). The perceived motivation for this messaging bill is antisemitism. This is Jewish space lasers lady.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So? Her bill is about cutting off money for weapons to Israel not Jewish space lasers.

4 real progressives voted yes.