this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
554 points (98.6% liked)
Games
20457 readers
663 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans
It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.
Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy
They probably do wear diapers aswell.
Some, maybe. Regardless, if two consenting adults want to pretend to be animals or even pretend to be kids while they hump I really don’t see a problem.
That's the fucking thing. It's played up to the point that kids might find it and like it.
It wouldn't be a problem if they didn't fucking have conventions celebrating it. With kids.
Or, you know. On FUCKING STEAM.
Isn't that the same argument used against homosexuals?
You aren't born as a furry, you fucking weirdo. You make that decision on your own
It’s kind of messy because I think there is a subset of the fandom where it isn’t necessarily sexualized. Like, Khajit and Argonians from Elder Scrolls are pretty much furries but they’re not explicitly sexual. Feel like I’m getting over my skis in terms of my understanding of that fandom since I’m not in that world. No idea how if at all those cons keep the kid safe stuff separate from the sex shit, if at all.
Yes, furry conventions that allow children do not allow children into 18+ spaces. At the very least there's always staff checking attendee badges which tend to say right on them if the attendee is an adult or not.
Pretty much what I expected, thanks for confirming
Oh wow. There is this strange non-sexualized offshoot that just dresses up and doesn't want to fuck Lola bunny because they couldn't understand how people works. How nice for them.
I think you should be more concerned about easily accessible things like hentai sites, weirdos, elsagate, etc. I don't know if there are any free hentai games on Steam (and if there are, they shouldn't be free), but children certainly shouldn't have free access to Steam (or even the internet in general), and if some parents kids can just spend their parents money on hentai/porn/whatever, then maybe those parents should rethink their parenting methods and pay more attention to their kids, imho.
you must be into beastility, if your projecting this much about it, .