this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
553 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60074 readers
3507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kpw@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How do those governments have access to this data? Is it not TLS encrypted?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article states that Apple recommends not putting any sensitive data in the payloads as well as encrypting the payloads

This sounds a lot like a scenario where Apple informs that a mechanism used for standard mobile communication is being survived by governments not necessarily a scenario where something Apple or google are doing is inherently surveillance.

Here it seems like the surveillance is occurring at the 3rd parties who send the push notifications.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Right?

First they get location data because cell towers and people not caring.

Then they notice all these message notifications between these dozen people at this time, at this location, that happens to coincide with a protest.

Ding, fries are done!

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apple would be able (and perhaps required?) to provide the decrypted data. TLS is not end-to-end encryption; it's just server-to-client. It's useful to prevent MITM wiretapping but it is NOT useful to prevent server-side spying.

The article quotes Apple as saying they can update their transparency report now that this is public. Doesn't look like they have data for 2023 yet at https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/

I'd think Apple could make push notification content end-to-end encrypted if they so desired, but I don't know how they could avoid having access to the vendor and user at minimum for the sake of validation and delivery.

[–] ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

To turn that question around, what incentive do the corporations have to encrypt that data? Whole bunch easier to just not care.