cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/31694909
Remember the "I want a white one" video? That's the first video I clearly remember having a text-to-speech voice-over. It was really bad TTS, and it was awesome. Lately, though, I find myself wishing video hosting services like Youtube and Peertube (to a lesser degree) had a filter so that I could filter out any videos with TTS voice overs. Does this bother anyone else?
I'm a little torn about it. There are legitimate reasons for people to use them; I've seen commentary from posters about social anxiety that makes even recording audio difficult, and TTS must be fantastic for mute folks. Non-native English speakers may be more comfortable with it. I'm sure the platform doesn't help... how many videos do you have to post where the peanut gallery mocks your verbal mistakes before you give up and just have an engine read your written text? I've also noticed that the use of TTS is far, far worse on Youtube -- I have yet to come across a single video on any Peertub site that uses it, although it must exist.
Like a lot of technology, generated speech is getting abused, and since TTS has valid uses, I put it in the "enshittification" category. It's used on every bulk, low-effort "N greatest/funniest/random-adjective" videos; I hear it in increasingly in those suspiciously AI-smelling, ad-ish "reviews" that just read specs and make an odd comment about how cool it is; and there's so much more low-quality, low-information content that feels AI generated uses it -- or maybe it feels AI generated because it uses it. It's almost always on just awful content.
TTS on video content is a perfect example of "this is why we can't have nice things." I am starting to hate it so much, I abort whatever I'm starting to watch as soon as I hear the absurd cadence and mispronunciations -- I'd rather hear an honest non-native speaker making mistakes than that terrible TTS crap.
Whatever the reason, the use of TTS is a trend I'm putting firmly in the "enshittification" category, but am I overreacting here? Do you have a way of dodging or identifying content that uses TTS, in advance?
You're being very exclusionary to people who have anxiety and can't record their own voices by reading their own text.
You know, "back in the day", you'd use Fiverr to have a real person voice over your video, if that's the excuse.
Yeah, quite true and well said. Or just a mate with a better voice (than we have).
We seem to have lost our society somehow. I don't care whether any one group or person is to blame. I miss it.
You're being very disingenuous in applying human rights terminology to something that has sweet fuck all to do with human rights.
Or do you think it's a human rights violation that an actor, say, be required to know how to act? Or a musician be required to know music? Or a chef be required to know cookery?
Your variety of faux-leftist bullshit is why the left has suffered setback after setback in the past few decades.
There are no statutory limitations to the use of human rights legislation as far as I am aware.
You don't appear to have grasped the tenet of my point. You may be attacking disability for your own far right ideals. Why should someone have to voice their prose to satisfy your fat-right demand that all artists be able to sing, dance and present. All cooks can cook not necessarily just collate recipes.
That they wrote the text is enough. The human race is not the Uber race you are trying to enforce. Someone tried that before, it didn't work out well.
It seems like a leap to accuse somebody of having far-right ideals, or trying to engineer an Ubermensch, because they don't like text-to-speech videos.
Keep undermining your cause. Apparently the western left doesn't learn from over a decade of continued abject failure.
But do it in your own feed, please. (Not that you'll be polluting mine any further.)