this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
695 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

8568 readers
3162 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

you did though, it was your first line:

My hot take: there’s no such thing as “singular they”

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They are saying plural means 1 or many while singular means only 1. So 'they' was always plural and plural always included singular.

Sadly dictionary definition says plural does not include 1.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

pedantic language nerds on Lemmy? no way!

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

nm, the rest of the thread is the same.. you are not alone.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s obvious what I meant from that is the opposite of how you are construing it. You need to actually read the entire comment.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

it's not obvious, sorry. if it were, people would be agreeing with you