this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
425 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

25351 readers
1616 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be fine if it used a custom parameter for their tags. Using class names makes for bad accessibility.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How are class names relevant for accessibility?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They might mean class names can't help screen readers parse meaning, whereas using the correct tag can?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://lemmy.zip/comment/19872383

Usability by third-parties. A webpage is not a pdf.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You think only aria-attributes are accessibility? Most accessible is, what you not need additional tools and interpreters for.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it's of course not just aria attributes. But it's definitely not "how easy can I create user CSS". Accessibility is a term of art, you can't just expand its meaning to whatever you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Look, if it hinders me in my workarounds for my ADHD while every other framework does less so, then accessibility is worse. Shut up with your trademark gatekeeping bullshit.

Also,