this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1481 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

8337 readers
3671 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 115 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what I figured they meant.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah, but those other stats are raw numbers. Okay, we have a higher number of unhoused people and food-insecure people, but we also have a higher number of people, period. If you wanna make a point, it has to be per capita. I like how the first stat got this right, but the others did not.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 13 points 1 day ago

Ya might be a good point but it’s a distracting mess

Thankfully we already know a little bit about both of our situations so we get the gist

[–] msage@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US population: ~350M Japan population: ~125M

Not even 3x as much.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You're not wrong. I'm just saying, if you want to make that point, you should compare per capita.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

.2% per year? So we should expect about 10% of people to be murdered by 50?

I was going to say .2% is better than I thought, but that’s pretty dire.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

0.2 people, not percentage. That was what they were trying to straighten out because percent per 100k doesn't make sense.