this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
76 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13914 readers
787 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So an NBC article says that injunctions would now "apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued."
Does that mean an injunction granted for a state suing on behalf of its residents would protect all those residents? Or is it more that it would protect only the state government itself?
If it's the former, feels like yet another way life in blue and red states is seriously diverging
I have no idea and I'm really curious about that too. I follow a lot of people on law Bluesky and I've looked at a ton of posts already but I only found one post on that. It was by the CEO of the Onion.
So far it seems to be all jokes. Maybe in the coming hours - there will be some serious law content in there.
--
Edit
This is related - https://hexbear.net/comment/6284526
I don't wish to leave my comrades in red states exposed directly to the fascist US, but at the same time id like to be able to build a safe, equitable, and affordable place for them to move to.