this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
59 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10172 readers
653 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Everyone must switch to Sasktel, Freedom, TBayTel, Sogetel, Ice, Cogeco, Videotron and Eastlink.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Also Teksavvy!

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Any plan that starts with "If everyone can just..." is doomed to fail. This needs legislation and at least the threat of nationalisation if not the act.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Been on Sasktel all my life, started getting more actively involved in politics when Wall wanted to sell 49% (or 51% I don’t remember) of Sasktel as a trial run or whatever the heck he called it.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't see how 51% could be a trial of anything as they'd lose control. 49% you could see how pressure from investors harms the company though and could painfully be walked back from. Terrible idea though.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They were considering selling 49%, but the percentage is meaningless without looking at the articles, the bylaws, and resolutions. A lot of corporations make things more strict than the Bus Corp. act. You can always make things more strict, you can't make them more lax.

In fact, some things require a "Special Resolution" which is 2/3rds.
BUT, that can mean 2/3 of the shareholders who show up, as long as enough people show up to make a quorum.
And a quorum can be as small as 1 person, again, depending on the Articles, bylaws, and resolutions.

If you feel like learning about the Saskatchewan Business Corporations act, here is it:
https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/astat/ss-2021-c-6/latest/ss-2021-c-6.html

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Been on Freedom since 2010. Fuck ROBeLUS.