this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
356 points (97.1% liked)

memes

15647 readers
4364 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I think it makes more sense to say that money is the great filter that's threatening us right now. It's the root of all evil, after all.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Love of money is the root of all evil.

In reality, it's more like unfettered greed of certain people

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would say that psychologically it’s the addiction of power. We toe the line where “competition” creates the dopamine release of “being better than others.”

Yet for some that means it’s never enough. Richest person in the world? Need to take over government. Most powerful world leader? Need to assert myself even more.

I think the great filter often boils down to unnecessary competition. In the short term it leads to technological strides, but in the long term it becomes a species self-harm, and perhaps broader. A good theoretical example is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_of_Earth's_Past

Tap for spoilerEvery species that exists within that series is so focused on ensuring they have the most power that they will go out of their way to annihilate any other species due to the assumption that’s what all of them will do is seek more power. Ironically considering the scientific and technological capabilities of the involved parties, they may have been able to work together towards a better outcome than “anyone who isn’t me is my enemy” which is basically universal fascism.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been floating the idea that evolution is the ultimate culprit. Add intelligence to "most prolific, genetically" and get capitalism, then late stage capitalism in our technological age, and viola...

I've been told I'm insane, though, so take it with a grain of salt

[–] jabeez@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

Well, that ending might lead one to believe there's maybe a smidge of insanity.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Money is just paper. Now it's just bits on a disk.

The human need to acquire I think is the problem.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you don't think money is power, and your don't think information is power either. What is?

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

They are saying it is more general than money or information, that those are power but those specifically are not special. If we had a society without money, something else would occupy the same purpose of the psychological need of humans "to get more" to be on top.

They aren't saying "money isn't important to that", they are saying "money isn't important to that".

[–] storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Power not money. Government, patriarchy, racism, and their ilk all drive people in similarly destructive ways, money is just the (highly visible) common language.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's actually type b personally disorders. Without them, capitalism couldn't exist.

[–] Consumer2747@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mental health professional here. Can confirm. But they need a lot of enablers.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the other half of the filter. Regular people follow them.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

No, not really.