this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
646 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
2625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look up the target method. They can automatically connect your face/payment ID to items you haven't scanned. They get you after you've racked up enough cumulative value that you haven't paid for to count for a felony.

So no, they aren't sticking you with a felony charge for a loaf of bread. They're sticking you with a felony charge for enough loafs of bread to value a serious theft charge.

It's not going to effect you if you only ever stole one loaf of bread. Waiting until you commit enough theft is the cutting corners part you're talking about.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facial profiles and items stolen require directories, centralized databases, hard drives, programming, knowing the items. Personal to sift through the data.

Companies think that's cheaper than self check out?

You must not be an engineer.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to do with what I think. That is what they do. Why don't you put any amount of effort into verifying what I said instead of insulting me like you think I just made it up?

You don't think that loss prevention would be doing that stuff regardless of whether they had employed cashiers at registers or not? Loss prevention has been around since long before self checkout lanes, doing the same things they're doing now. They already pay those guys. Self checkout is still cheaper if they don't also have to pay a dozen cashiers.

Also, you seem to be imagining a whole fbi crime scene setup in every store for a job that's basically handled per location by 2 guys and a computer.

A "database" doesn't have to be (and usually isn't) centralized across stores. "Hard drives" can be a single multi-terabyte hdd in the age we're in now. "Programming" is just out of the box software they teach their prevention guys to use. The facial recognition and knowing items part comes built into the self checkout machine.

You must not be an engineer either, because an engineer would understand that the cheaper option isn't necessarily lower tech.

Again, take 10 minutes and learn how to utilize a search engine. It's not something they want people to know, but it's also not exactly a secret. Target pioneered the kind of loss prevention techniques big box stores use today.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

This is what I found. It’s just an attic from somewhere, but it has lots of references.