205
She Won. They Didn't Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election.
(thiswillhold.substack.com)
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
205 points (80.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3002 readers
1454 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Seriously. I’ve had discussions with people since the election about how they say it was stolen. Until there’s hard receipts, then it’s not even worth the time considering it to me.
How do you propose getting those "receipts"?
We don't, that's not our job. You don't just believe everything because it's hard to prove the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK_hwFSEdPs
I mean that's the issue, that's also why this case that's going on is so huge. There's so many statistical anomalies that it's nearly impossible that he won every battleground state.....but there's been no smoking gun. There's never been solid enough evidence to warrant a court case. Hopefully we get the 'hard receipts' your looking for in this court case
Also can we talk about how data even comes to be? Who tf is paying for all these “hard receipts”? Who’s doing the work, who’s analyzing it, who has the access to everything needed to even do the work? The information is obviously being obfuscated and destroyed, like people asking for “hard receipts” think US fascism actually keeps their receipts when no fascist government has ever allowed contradictory information to spread or even exist? People seem to both love data and refuse to accept it’s so easily hidden, destroyed and changed in such an opaque environment. The only time “hard receipts” ever exist is in a completely transparent and forthcoming environment. Honestly most of what we all believe has no “hard receipts” they’re just accepted because it looks and feels right and we have some “soft receipts” to prove to others our feelings are more feelings than theirs
Control over media is a tenant of fascism
The statistical anomalies are made up. They sound excellent plausible, but turn go and verify any of the actual numbers. Swing states really weren't any different from other states. They're not real discrepancies.
You act like it's easy. Republican states shred their data before turning it over (like what happened in Georgia a few years back over one of the state races. It's a cyclical issue. You can't look at the data if you don't have the evidence to warrant looking at it, and you can't get the evidence if you can't look at the data.
But no....the anomalies aren't made up. You just haven't been paying attention to what's been going on with it, and that's okay, it's a lot to keep up with.
Or it's a conspiracy theory meant to distract us. I haven't seen anything credible.
I especially don't want to call wolf now when it may very well happen soon.
And even then, I'm not sure what it would accomplish. You're not going to undo Trump's inauguration. At best, it could protect the integrity of the next election, but now there are other options available to undermine it.
Meanwhile, elections since then have swung hard against Trump supporters, including one in Wisconsin where Elon dumped a small fortune and made a personal appearance. If they're so good at rigging machines, why aren't they continuing to use this ability?
I'm skeptical of this claim of election fuckery but, if it was true, you'd want to limit the use as to not get caught.