this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
840 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7968 readers
2774 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 49 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

The US literally sanctioned the ICC judges. There's not gonna be a Nuremberg trial for them lol.

Germany wasn't exactly in a position to stop them from being on trial.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Could change rapidly. I doubt Nazi Germany started under the purview of the ICC. (I think ICC was created in response.)

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There was no jurisdiction at the time. The Nuremberg trials were essentially kangaroo courts with no solid basis in law, performed because the gravity of the Nazi crimes was so great something had to be done. As such some of the judges were uneasy about handing down death sentences, as many of the crimes they were charged with were not crimes in the Third Reich, and international law hadn’t developed sufficiently to take over.

The ICC came around in the 1990s, partially in response to calls from those involved in the Nuremberg trials for provision for a more robust and legal process, that didn’t rely on conquest first.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

American soldiers aren’t in the jurisdiction of the ICC or any international court anyway.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

America isn't in the jurisdiction of the ICC, but American soldiers who commit crimes within ICC countries are. This means that American soldiers according to international law can, for example, be prosecuted for crime they commit in support of Israel's genocide.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That really isn't how that works. The US has declared that they won't allow the international courts to get involved, but that doesn't necessarily prevent those courts from disagreeing.

"Jurisdiction" is only a thing when a court answers to some higher authority who has limited what that court can do. Since the international courts theoretically don't answer to the US government, they can make any ruling they like.

They're unlikely to bother, since they probably won't be in a position to enforce any ruling against typical foot soldiers, but they absolutely could if it came to that point

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

They could, but it would be a big mistake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

You may have heard it called the, "Invade the Hague Act."

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I have no idea if the gaurdian is a good source but I had no idea about this so I figured I'd grab an article link for anyone who also had no ideas this happened recently

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/05/marco-rubio-sanctions-icc-judges-israel-gaza

(Feel free to reply with links to better sources if you'd like :)

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 17 points 12 hours ago

The guardian in general is a pretty trustworthy source afaik.