this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
159 points (97.6% liked)

PC Gaming

11279 readers
399 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 74 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’m so happy this other large company which wants to embed itself as a storefront and soak up fees won against the other large company which was already doing it.

Like, genuinely I am, but Epic isn’t doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. Epic/Sweeney is mostly sad they didn’t have the monopoly first.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ask any game dev if they're happy Epic won this battle? If they say no then they've never tried to release a game on a marketplace. This is a huge win for developers.

[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am a dev. I said I’m glad they won. Epic still sucks, though.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so am i. And I'll agree epic sucks in some ways, sweeney in more, but they also provide a relatively awesome toolset. i think epic has gotten a lot of undue hate just for having a marketplace seperate from steam - but steam has been exploiting devs for a long ass time too.

[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 1 points 1 hour ago

It’d be easier to side with Epic if they put really any effort at all into the Epic Games Store. I know there’s a lot of features to catch up on to be competitive to Steam, but considering they spent hundreds of millions of dollars on exclusivity, you’d think they would spend more on improving EGS.

To some extent, people will hate EGS anyway, but if they just quietly trucked along adding feature after feature, those that use it would spread the word. Instead, it largely stagnated and people kept reporting to others that it generally still sucks.

Playing catch-up takes time but at least the company that does already has an enumerated list of features to implement and can glean ideas about how to do so.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who cares? It's a win for everyone.

Biggest disappointment is that it took a rich twat to twist the government's arm and do what should've done 10 years ago.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give Tim Sweeney lots of money? Why would the government do that?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's what you're celebrating.

You can make some vague claims that it's going to be good for small businesses and independent developers... but realistically it's only going to pad the pockets of the already rich. Any benefit to anyone else is going to be negligible.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's what you're celebrating.

I don't even know what money you're talking about. Hard to celebrate that.

realistically it's only going to pad the pockets of the already rich

...you mean Apple? No. It will benefit literally everyone else.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now Epic can finally install their own payment system, bypassing Apple’s parental controls, and little Timmy can just enter the details from mommy’s credit card when Epic gets him addicted to ~~gambling~~ loot boxes.

Such a win for consumers.

[–] alessandro@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have laws to protect children, no other companies: we need laws that hit hard companies that don't respect people (and other companies)'s rights.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 1 day ago

We have laws to protect children

Hahaha, good one.

we need laws that hit hard companies that don't respect people (and other companies)'s rights.

In the US? That’s not going to happen. The US is run by corporations.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a dumb bar to judge them by. Not a single entity with an interest in fighting this fight would be doing it out of the goodness of their hearts

[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 8 points 1 day ago

They did a good thing but I still get to judge them for ultimately being greedy.