this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
31 points (84.4% liked)
Technology
1148 readers
101 users here now
A tech news sub for communists
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You indeed taught me a few things. Sure. I'll stick with organizing and the ground-work though as I was never good with coding or any of the examples shown it has uses in. The work I do has zero relevance to A.I as of now, so that could be to do with that anything to do with A.I still disgusts me despite the points and facts that you have. I guess I'm a luddite in that area. Getting old sucks.
I wasn't arguing against open-source, nor the fact that I am disgracing the technology as completely useless, said more harm than good. I'm saying that it's going to cause major harm and that having open-source alternatives doesn't mean you own the technology. But you are correct, I am not focusing on the good that it could do.
I'm still in partial disagreement that open-source alternatives truly will change anything. I've seen open-source released before for many products and people still flock over to established products. That could change though and you could very well be right. We shall see in that department. I still don't think open-source technology means ownership of it. It simply is a relation. I am not railing against open-source. It's hard to see the good in these things when they affect the neighborhoods you live in.
I suppose we'll see the uses this technology can have. A.I; not open-source technology.
Look at it this way, when technology developed in the open then there is at least a chance of it being applied in a positive fashion, but if it's solely in the hands of capitalists then there isn't even a possibility of that happening. That's my fundamental argument here.