this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
505 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck AI

3016 readers
578 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaredwhite@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is actually a really good point. Culture paved the way for the sheen of hyper "detailed" AI art (many of the details fall apart on close scrutiny, but I digress) by making it seem like "amateur" art is bad while "professional" art is good. So that means if a tool comes along that supposedly makes it so you can sidestep sweating over your amateur art and go straight to pumping out the professional-looking stuff, that's a win. It's good to question this assumption.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah like hyper realism. Just print it bro (I don't like hyper realism, there is no creative part in it IMO).

There were lots of similar discussions when the camera was invented, turns out it did take the job of soullessly copying things in paint away, but got used as a tool by artists.

There is no art in AI and will never be, but as it gets better it will be used as another tool for learning etc I guess.

[–] jaredwhite@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're driving at. It's true that the rise of photography had an effect on painting such that styles which moved away from realism became the norm for a while, but long since we've seen a shift back to realism and a continuation of detailed portraiture or landscape illustrative techniques among some artists.

My point simply is that people who lack the technique/talent to create "fine art" have come to believe their work is of no value, which I find upsetting because I'd much rather look at "bad" human-produced art than generated slop with the superficial appearance of fine technique.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

You're completely correct IMO, I was mostly blurbing about an event similar to AI. Back then you could finish a painting elsewhere thanks to a snapped photo, today people can prompt up a specific scene and train off of that one. IMO it's just tools, but you're right, some people believe they are artists just because they "prompt" up a hashed copy of the masters.