this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
1236 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7930 readers
3324 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 174 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You misspelled "comically overvalued"

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That much overvaluation isn't comical, it's scary. That bubble bursting is going to mess up some retirement funds.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if your retirement fund is in tesla stock you only have yourself to blame

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you are determining the direction of your retirement fund which most aren't.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

as someone who is very far from retiring i have no idea about how people manage their retirement funds or how that whole system works. youre right, that would indeed be quite terrible

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The majority of people with 401ks don't actively manage them, it's usually generic broad based index funds or similar, which at this point almost assuredly includes Tesla

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How much better does the rest of the portfolio do after Musk is ruined and can't buy elections, though?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

seems pretty weird to me for them to include a volatile stock such as tesla

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

On a longer timescale, Tesla volatility was actually pretty low with a strong tend upwards.

This is not financial advice yada yada but I'd recommend researching how ETFs, and broad based indices decide on what stocks to include.

I m thinking of those who have pension funds or 401ks that hold TSLA

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, shit should be like 25 a share and have a solid dividend

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the functional profitable technology giant that is often the worlds most profitable enterprise building future systems year after year after year?

Probably overvalued, but not comically. This dipshit fired the entire infrastructure charging group last year because he was out of adderall for twenty minutes. There is no comparison.

tscm is more valuable than apple, investors have a consumer market bias

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

If it helps i put the kibash on Disney and Apple. Ever since i bought both of them, neither has netted me a positive return.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

How TF can it be still positive YoY is beyond my understanding. Sales outside of US are tanking, the brand reputation ODd and died, the CEO will follow soon and he's hated by everyone except tech bros.

I guess publicly fighting orange Hitler should be the last nail in the coffin, but I don't even know what to expect.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And yet still up for the month.

That ticker is insane.