148
Israeli foreign minister says arms embargoes will lead to 'second Holocaust' and end of Israel
(www.middleeasteye.net)
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
148 points (96.2% liked)
World News
36982 readers
852 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Second holocaust?
Dude, you are committing the second holocaust, so that technically would be the third.
Having said that, aren't you kind of the reason why that would happen in the first place? Israel has had more than enough opportunities to make peace with everyone around it a hundred times over and so far all it has done is investing in making sure that shit got worse, like actually funding Hamas so that they could fight Hamas harder.
You dug your own grave here, I won't push you in it, but I also won't cry for you if you decide to jump in it
assuming holocaust=genocide, then this is not the second. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides
A Holocaust, ~~entomologically~~ etymologically, is a mass sacrifice in fire.
This genocide is particularly notable for how many people have been burned.
entomology is the study of bugs
Autocorrupt got me.
Holocaust is the name of one particular genocide. There is only the one. Perhaps the word will be used for another genocide some day but if so it's going to be entirely arbitrary.
The word holocaust is an ancient greek one. Not made to be limited what you claim. You will have to live with that fact I'm afraid. You dont get to police everyones use of language, we'll use language like it was made to be used thanks.
Yes, but it didn't refer to a genocide before. That's like saying "the word spam predates the internet," and calling me a prescriptivist for saying the word "spam" in its digital sense is a neologism with a different meaning. You should note that I mentioned the older meaning of holocaust in this same thread, here.
I'm being perfectly descriptivist btw -- I am acknowledging that there may some day be another genocide widely referred to as "a holocaust," but in general usage I just don't see people refer to any other genocide as a holocaust. If this starts happening I'll retract my stance, which I don't even remember because the comment above was deleted.
Once again, I'll use language how I like and I wont be assigned meanings and told how to speak by anyone, about anything. And I dont think anyone else should allow you to do that to them either.
Lately language has been aggressively weaponized and I think thats awful. Thanks anyway for your concern about my using language properly. Thats very neighborly of you.
But it's not even you who I was replying to? It was someone who has now been banned? Unless you're their alt, in which case you could really help me out here by reminding me what this was even about in the first place.
Anyway, if you would like to call genocides "holocausts," I am not going to get on your case about that. But if you will use the word holocaust that way, there's no particularly good reason to call the one in gaza either the second or third holocaust, not as far as I can see.
By the way, I used the word "holocaust" in the sense you are using it at the start of this very thread. So I honestly cannot understand what it is you think I'm policing. I think you might just suck at reading comprehension.
my mistake, I did respond to the wrong person.
all forgiven
wow! you're actually insane!
Holocaust as a word has an ancient etymology meaning ~fire, but as a proper noun it refers to a (particular) genocide. The holocaust did in fact happen and Jews were targeted. Fuck off nazi.