this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
183 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59597 readers
3045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't know how it will eventually happen, but Microsoft is going to own everything open ai someday. They are playing the long game

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah this feels like some kind of coup

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Lol no.

They aren't going to extinguish OpenAI, they are going to use their tech for everything

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Extinguish isn't about snuffing the tech out, it's about pushing everyone else out of the market after you have extended it in a proprietary fashion and used your market dominance to create a defacto monopoly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That'd only work with proprietary tech.

AI is pure math and that math is freely available. There are already many competitors with similar functionality and there isn't much Microsoft can do to change that.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

EEE has been used against open source tools in the past (it's where the extend part comes in), and crushing competition with the full weight of the MS machine is kinda the point. I think you're being too quick to handwave it away, but I'd love to be wrong. In any case, not interested in changing your mind enough to argue with you about it. Have a nice day!

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

No, they are going to sell the tech to others, microsoft doesnt know what to do with it. Extinguish doesn't mean the thing no longer exists, it means that the entity openai, and it's mission and what it was created for gets extinguished. And microsofts version of that geared towards shareholder value

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're going to extinguish the ability of others to use it to displace them

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That would mean having a monopoly on computation, which is never gonna happen.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

My speculation is that they paid Sutskever a lot of money to go away and keep his mouth shut

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already do. Their licensing agreement with OpenAI is crazily favourable to them. They have basically unlimited rights to use OpenAI's tech forever, and have a claim on most of OpenAI's future profits.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

right now they have a very favourable deal, but don't control the for-profit entity or the non-profit entity (officially) - which means all they can actually leverage is the tech that openai makes for their own uses.

and microsoft making things often just flops hard, look at what they are doing with it, your start menu talks to you now.

the goal is not to have a favourable deal, it's to grow shareholder value by owning openai in 6-7 years

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s a hell of a “non-profit” to “mother of for-profit monopolists” transition. Obviously it had started years ago and this past few weeks was just the calamitous release of pent-up tension. But still, Microsoft of all companies.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The firing and subsequent rehire/board change was clearly orchestrated in a way to benefit Altman and Microsoft. I don't have the hate boner for Microsoft that most Lemmy users have, but it's not a particularly great sign of a healthy tech company your "owner" feels the need to pull a stunt like this.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yea I wasn’t trying to channel any particular Microsoft hate. You could probably sub any of the big tech companies in. Either way it’s a massive for-profit to the point of pushing the lines of monopolism.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, at this point, it feels like beating a dead horse, but somehow they're still doing Embrace-Extend-Extinguish...