this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
161 points (89.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
571 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just got up from conversation with a couple of older black men, that I said "well I got to go back to work and start cracking the whip." And it occurred to me then that it was probably a really insensitive stupid thing to say.

Sadly, it hadn't occurred to me until it's already said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I remember in my 20s the phrase "indian giver" coming out of my mouth. I hadn't used that phrase since I was a kid of 10 years old or so.

I immediately realized that I should never say that shit again. Adult me realized it is a horrible thing to say but as a kid I just thought it meant you gave and asked for it back. I had much more context as an adult.

Most of the time I think before I speak, but not always.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's called Welshing.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh god I went to a public school rear a native reserve, it was always insane to me to see how many times the faculty referred to things as 'Indian'

Ex. we had an Indian meal day that i don't think was either east India nor native american inspired

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

American Indians prefer to be called Indian, not Native American.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Kinda broad statement considering some do but some are offended by it.

Of course its entirely incorrect given they aren't in India, so it seems obvious not to call them indian (shit even some actual east Indians are offended by it, especially cause now they need to be called east indians)

and more anecdotally all indigenous people I've met couldn't careless what theyre called down to calling themselves 'indjiuns'

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My wife works on reservations. I haven't heard of any of the tribes she works with being fine with being called Native American. They have their own government organization called the Bureau of Indian Affairs, it seems pretty clear that they prefer that term.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes great! But they don't live in India :( So it's pretty hard to call them indians

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not really. If you’re struggling with it it’s a you problem (and probably partially racism to boot). This isn’t a hard concept. Mexicans are Americans, Canadians are Americans, Peruvians are Americans, even though none of them live in the USA. Just because we (white people) decided to call two locations India doesn’t mean that only one group gets that name. That’s idiotic.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This is halarious, youre definitely american aren't you?

Canadians aren't in america eh? Absolutely no classification we can think of, perhaps a continent or 2 that could describe let's say a north and south "america" of some sort?

Id encourage you to try and find another true analogy though, and you'll see it doesnt exist - cause everywhere else's name is based on where it is

also I gotta edit to add this, I'd love to see where you perceive racism in my comment, just as a readers exercise

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Canadians aren’t in america eh? Absolutely no classification we can think of, perhaps a continent or 2 that could describe let’s say a north and south “america” of some sort?

are you purposefully misreading my comments? it's like you're trying to read the exact opposite of what I said.

also I gotta edit to add this, I’d love to see where you perceive racism in my comment, just as a readers exercise

you literally said that a group shouldn't be called what it wants to be because it's not from a specific region. that's literally racism. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Canadians are called american cause they're in NORTH AMERICA, not cause US has a monopoly on the classification american.

The rest I'm outta energy to argue but essentially yeah don't use blanket terms

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Canadians are called american cause they’re in NORTH AMERICA, not cause US has a monopoly on the classification american.

Yes... exactly. dude. you literally just proved my point. India does not have a monopoly on the classification Indian. Holy fuck dude.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This has gotta be intentional stupidity at this point right?

You understand things in time happen in a linearr order right? Ie if someone hurt me then I hurt them, they're the bad guy. I hurt someone and they hurt me 🫢 an entirely different scenario

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Your logic continues to make zero sense. What are you even talking about? You literally cannot even put together a coherent sentence. Good luck dude. Maybe you should take some time off the internet, come back, read how racist you sound in this thread, and then take some more time off, because you clearly are having issues.

[–] ikanreed@mastodon.social 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@Sethayy the existence of people not offended by something prejudiced always seems to be dragged out as a justification for that prejudice.

If some people being offended isn't reason enough not to say something, then it stands to reason that some people not being offended isn't a reason why it's okay.

If it is, then there are definitely people who are offended.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay, but what if they like being called indian as opposed to native american? Now you're being offensive to those people. It's kind of like that ridiculous latinx term that some PC people have being pushing for a few years now, I'm yet to meet anyone thay likes being called that as opposed to just latino/latina.

If you're in doubt what to call someone, just ask, don't assume.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Excellent! So let's just call them what country they live in, which isn't India (nor even close to India)

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I hear just 'natives' more often. That reminds me though of this girl I knew who was just pissed about the term "African American", saying "I ain't got nothin to do with Africa! I'm Black!".

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You're referring to Americans with heritage in the Indian subcontinent, right?

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

They are not, and what they said is broadly correct, but of course individuals vary.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

No I'm not. My wife works on reservations. American Indians prefer to be called Indians, not Native Americans.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

And Indian cuts. I realized it was racist when I heard the next generation calling them Chinese cuts.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Or Indian sunburns. Or sitting Indian style.