this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2875 readers
754 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm noticing a weird tax cliff. Someone earning $149,999 (approximately; I didn't look up the exact amount) qualifies, and someone earning $150,001 is excluded entirely. So that mythical thing where earning more money can be worse for you, that is almost never a real thing.... it's actually a thing here.

That's kinda fucky, but idk how many people that could actually impact.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

The especially dumb thing is this is for cash tips reported for taxation, so they can just underreport if/when they expect the limits to be an issue.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plus the tax deduction cap is a hard value without any callout to the treasury department to modify the cap as inflation grows. So if we hit a hyperinflation scenario, a $25k cap won't mean shit. Congrats on getting a free hotdog's worth of tax writeoffs.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

So the earning limit is indexed but the amount you can claim is not. Somehow half idiocy is much worse than full idiocy.