this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
939 points (98.0% liked)

You Should Know

38246 readers
1684 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

RCV trends: Four states ban RCV in 2025, bringing the number of states with bans to 15.

(Okay idk why it says 15 up here then later says 16, somebody on that site probably didn't update the title text)

As of April 30, five states had banned RCV in 2025, which brought the total number of states that prohibit RCV to 16.

  • Gov. Mark Gordon (Republican) signed HB 165 on March 18.
  • West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (Republican) signed SB 490 the March 19.
  • Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly (Democrat) signed SB 6 into law on April 1.
  • North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong (Republican) signed HB 1297 on April 15.
  • Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (Republican) signed HB 1706 which became law on April 17.

Six states banned RCV in 2024.

Why YSK: If you're a US-American, its time to pay attention to State and Local politics instead of solely on the Federal. There is a trend in conservative jurisdictions to stop progress in making elecoral systems more fair. Use this opportunity as a rallying-cry to pass Ranked-Choice Voting in progressive jurisdictions, and hopefully everyone else takes notes. Sometimes, all you need is a few states adopting a law to become the catalyst for it to become the model for the entire country, for better or for worse. Don't allow anti-RCV legislations to dominate, counter the propaganda with pro-RCV arguments. Time to turn the tide.

Edit: fixed formatting

Edit 2: Added in the map so you don't have to click the link:

See the pattern? πŸ€”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

This is democrats and Republicans not wanting people to vote for their candidate of choice because they have to constantly play the game of the lesser of two evils. They wanna keep power

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 19 hours ago

Don't blame me; I voted for Kodos

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not even one state that has banned it is run by Democrats.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Gov. Mark Gordon (Republican) signed HB 165 on March 18.

West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (Republican) signed SB 490 the March 19.

Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly (Democrat) signed SB 6 into law on April 1.

North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong (Republican) signed HB 1297 on April 15.

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (Republican) signed HB 1706 which became law on April 17.

5/6 are Republican shitheads however.

This is the reality of the 'both sides...' arguments, yes both sides are guilty of doing despicable things but the scales are very heavily tipped in one direction.
Unfortunately with how far americans have legislated and tightened the stranglehold on control of the 'democratic' process, i dont see this ever being undone... 'willingly'...

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Kansas has Republican supermajorities in both legislative houses. She didn't have a choice but to sign.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Do you not know what a supermajority is?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago

Yes, I'm just saying making Republicans do extra work is good.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

While Kansas has a Democratic governor, I wouldn't call it a blue state. State Congress is likely all red. This was likely a ballot measure and the people voted on it. The governor just put into law what the people voted on. Nothing more.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So I looked into this being from Kansas it kind of pissed me off. Turns out she won with like 49% where the Rs got only 47 and two different third parties took about 4%. So Rs were pushing for it thinking those that cast third party would put them next over the Dem, while calling them wasted and spoiled votes. So this was proposed by the Wichita mayor under the guise that RCV was too complicated for people to understand, and likely kelly signed the ban because of fear she might lose her minor majority. Total fucking bullshit politics as usual.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 22 hours ago

So this was proposed by the Wichita mayor under the guise that RCV was too complicated for people to understand, and likely kelly signed the ban because of fear she might lose her minor majority. Total fucking bullshit politics as usual.

Sounds like them. Capitulating to Republicans because of fear.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While Kansas has a Democratic governor, I wouldn’t call it a blue state.

Ah so the one time it happened it doesn't count.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

By that logic, California is a red state because Schwarzenegger was Governor at one point.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes it was. California had a Republican in charge the people liked and kept around. Only really because he was an actor.

If Schwarzenegger was a random nobody, he wouldn't have won the recall.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So California is a red state? Got it.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I want you to tell people California was a red state from 2003 to 2011. Please do it and record it.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago

Your right about that, it is a fair thing to point out. However, I will mention that the democratic party has a hostile past to 3rd parties where they would do things like suing them to get them off ballots.

Here is one example for reference: https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-lawsuits-voting-north-carolina-raleigh-48f1e61c1988c7083edcdc7bb1eace4a

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And this is why you have the 2A