this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
137 points (86.2% liked)
Privacy
37976 readers
208 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Exactly. Just like they never tracked and stored our movements when we turned iff location history.
The class action suit they lost on that was fake news /s
Yeah... People are like this... It's All fake news until it isn't anymore and than everyone is Pikachu Faced...
After all they have done and still doing... I can ASSURE and GUARANTEE you with 100% certitude that they would NEVER do that... They are not that kind of evil. /s
Sigh ๐ฎโ๐จ๐ฎโ๐จ
There's a difference between saying "the secure enclave holds the biometric data securely and locally in a verifiable way with no mechanism to retrieve the actual data" and "trust them, don't worry about it"
That's different, it's technically possible not to comply with that statement because the location data is sent and stored, it takes just not deleting it to violate that, it just evaluates to a pinky promise that has to be verified by inspecting their systems.
This, on the other hand, is a technically verifiable claim, the code is open and it all runs locally on the same machine, the TEE will give the green light and that's how apps will accept your biometric verification, the only thing that might be suspicious is with the implementation of the TEE, I don't know if every manufacturer keeps the data it gets on the device or secretly communicates outside, this unknown is also a good reason to use a Google Pixel device if you care about that
From the Privacy Guides Mobile phones page
I mean it's okay to start scared and ignorant, but it's a choice to stay that way