this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
686 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

12049 readers
1230 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 37 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Why don't they add in shit employers care about like it makes everyone work 10x better only fools return to office. Shit like that. Shit people can use. The ghouls don't give a flying fuck if we are happy or not, eat better, sleep better. They want metrics that show if workers can produce more or not for same wages and same hours. Period.

Who is this study even for, who commissioned it.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Even when presented with the numbers they don't care. Management told us, going from 2 days in the office to full WFH increased our productivity by 15%, they're still forced to make us go back 3 days a week (so more than before COVID) and they told us that a reduction in productivity is expected.

[–] homoludens@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago

Shit people can use.

Sounds like people could use unions.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Your statement is very absolutist therefore it cannot be true.

Personally I did WFH for 4 years as a contractor and now I am back to office, but not always for forced to be in only 50% and I much prefer it, to the extent that I am doing more than 50% in the office.

I still have the option to just not go in if I don't feel like it, I am a bit under the weather or just haven't slept well or have stuff to take care of and I don't go in on fridays because traffic coming out of the city those days is horrendous.

I would probably quit if I had to dogmatically go in everyday no matter what.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Your statement is very absolutist therefore it cannot be true.

criticizes "absolutist" statement...with an absolute!

bold strategy, lmao!

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Feel free to refute my points if you want and actually contribute to the conversation , but you can't so you are doing a "dunking".

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

it wasn't a dunk, really...i merely pointed out the irony of condemning "absolutist statement"...in the form of an absolute statement, which i think is pretty funny!

you said "cannot be true", which, you know, is an absolute! ;)