this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
412 points (89.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12229 readers
1088 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The homeowners have two options, and both options suck.

  • sell
  • don't sell

Both alternatives carry costs. But they own a home worth 4.4mil and have to pay 2% of that each year. That's pretty low.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 28 points 1 week ago

Renters have two options:

  • get fucked
  • move (and get fucked)

At least if the homeowner sells they get the windfall.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hmm. So if you buy a house in your 20s, by the time you retire, you would have bought the equivalent of 2.5 houses. One for you, one from the government for the privilege of living in the one you bought, and half a house worth of interest to the bank.

That's an insane amount of money.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes. Living in a safe and orderly society has a subscription fee.

[–] laserm@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, if the US government wasn't so stingy about, y know, actually spending on it's people instead of the military, tax cuts for billionaires and buerocracy, it would be fine imo. Here, in CZ, I'm mostly fine with the taxes since we're a pretty safe country with decent healthcare. Despite the country still having a huge corruption problem and housing market in flames, it still somehow has higher living Ng standard than the US.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

100% we should complain about how our money is used, and how much is paid by whom. But that's a different complaint.

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your property taxes don't go towards those things though. Maybe a bloated police force, but that’s still usually funded via earned income tax.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Your federal taxes could go towards local governments if we prioritized it. There’s a choice made, and that choice forces cities to adopt as many taxes as they can get away with in order to fund themselves.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

American cities must be terribly poor to need to tax houses

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We don't have any rich people to tax.

.

Wait, we do? The fuck is going on then‽

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't you pay tax also for the purchase itself? Might be anothe 10%

And the yearly tax, is it based on purchase cost or current value? The later would be harsh seeing how they increase.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

There’s no tax on buying property, however, property taxes are a percentage of your property’s assessed value. In my locality, the assessed value has a lot of deductions whereby my 400K house is only taxable as 32K in value, so I pay 3K/year in taxes.

I can’t speak for Florida, but if it’s like Arizona, their property is worth a lot more than 4M if their total tax burden is 90K/year.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Current value, unless you have some exemption. Which is what stung these people.