this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)
PC Gaming
12613 readers
795 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're also hiring much more than they're laying off. They gained like 84k employees in the last 5-6 years (includes like 25k layoffs).
The bonus was also basically all stocks, so if the company does well, he gets more money. If it fails he gets less.
No, the bonus was all stocks so he can take a loan at 0% using the stocks as collateral and not have to pay taxes on it. If they paid him an actual bonus in real dollars he would have to pay taxes like one of us poors.
Or maybe they hired people with different roles. The article says they want to reduce the management structure. Microsoft probably didn't hire 100k managers these last couple of years.
Sometimes , probably always, MBA types want to show more profit and so make cuts to staff because labour is always the biggest expense...even if those employees could increase productivity in the long run.