this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
748 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you not think that being held in jail for 651 days without even a preliminary hearing is lack of due process?

Seems like a violation of the 14th amendment to me.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-3/ALDE_00013743/#ALDF_00028619

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I quoted the part where they're getting due process. What they're not getting is a speedy trial. The reasons for this are a system that's overwhelmed.

Specifically they're being held so long because of a failure in the act of complying with due process.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How is being held in jail without a hearing, for almost 2 years due process? Yes there is a huge issue with the amount of back log in the legal system no doubt. If this person is found to be innocent, or in the preliminary trial found that not enough evidence exists to charge this person, they have not been given due process, if they're lucky they will get a bit of money, while their entire life fell apart around them. They would have been detained in violation of the 14th. That is not due process.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How is being held in jail without a hearing, for almost 2 years due process?

You're waiting on a hearing, which is part of your due process.

Your issue here in conflating that concept with a speedy trial. The system is broken and overloaded in some places, and so compliance there is difficult.

I'm all for prison reform as a whole. I'm for ripping the whole incarceration system out by the roots. But words have actual meanings.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/procedural_due_process#:~:text=Overview,by%20a%20neutral%20decision%2Dmaker.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're absolutely correct words to have meaning.

-An unbiased tribunal.

  • Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it. -Opportunity to present reasons why the proposed action should not be taken. -The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses. -The right to know opposing evidence. -The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. -A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented. -Opportunity to be represented by counsel. -Requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented. -Requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and reasons for its decision.

This is from your source regarding due process.

None of these have happened due to the backlog of cases. As you said, he has not had due process given, because others are delayed in getting their due process. I understand being arrested doesn't mean a trial immediately. But wait times like this are completely criminal.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is just totally bad faith lol.

Dude its ok to be wrong.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's not in bad faith, and of course is ok to be wrong.