this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
915 points (98.2% liked)

Gaming

3248 readers
79 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I always find funny about the EGS hate crowd... They complain about the features it didn't have at launch (that it now has) but in the end having to launch any launcher pisses me off, might as well use the one with the least garbage! No Valve, I don't need fucking trading cards with my games!

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

might as well use the one with the least garbage!

That's why people use Steam!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Steam has a whole lot of useless features compared to Epic or GOG Galaxy, it's the most bloated launcher available at the moment. Do you need cards and tradable items linked to your account to play your games?

What's funny is that if the roles were reversed Epic would be accused of trying to monetize whales and gamblers, but no one bats an eye because it's Valve doing it.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j95kNwZw8YY

Valve is also improving overall gaming experience by supporting Linux but go off about opportunistic Tim Swiney.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're mixing up two separate debates, we're talking about the launcher experience, not about the OS they support.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Supporting an OS is a part of launcher experience ya dingus.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's clearly not part of this discussion because you can't compare the user experience on Linux when the product you want to compare to doesn't exist on it.

Also, you can just shut up if you can't have a discussion without insulting the people you're talking to, no one asked you to take part in the first place since clearly you're trying to derail the discussion.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lack of OS support is not a relevant point? Utter galaxy brain take lol.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a discussion where we're comparing the user experience of two products we need to compare them in an environment where both products are working so the user can experience them both.

I don't know how you can't figure that out but here we are.