this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
895 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3694 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas was found to be the state with the fewest personal freedoms, according to the Cato Institute's new Freedom Index.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean they have to do nothing about Red State Problems. Federalism isn't an excuse for letting fascism flourish just because it hasn't spread to your state yet.

Unless you're a Democrat. Then fuck red states, those worthless flyover people deserve it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is unadulterated bullshit

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suppose we'll see if my predictions hold true.

Until then, enjoy watching people who can't leave red states suffer.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All one needs to know to sniff out your bullshit is how the aca went down

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Oh, you mean how red states decided to opt out of medicare expansion out of spite, and how that was a Red State Problem? How democrats got a majority and didn't even try to fix the bug that let red states do that?

Do tell.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You seem real mad that people are able to govern themselves.

We might even agree on what direction things should go, but your refusal to acknowledge local responsibility for local laws makes it difficult to take you seriously.

I get that you want Democrats to save you from your local Republicans, but that isn't really how the country (or the world) works.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You seem real mad that people are able to govern themselves.

I'm real mad that the only time Democrats show an interest in my state, it's because a progressive is running against a centrist and they want to make sure the centrist wins.

I get that you want Democrats to save you from your local Republicans, but that isn’t really how the country (or the world) works.

Cool. When Democrats have fled the red states and can no longer get a majority in the Senate, the same problems you're happy to ignore because they're limited to the borders of my state and those like it? Those will be implemented nationwide. It'll be too late for all of us then.

Enjoy watching the suffering of poor people in flyover country until then.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No matter how much you hate Democrats, no one outside of trumpets will be able to take you seriously until you recognize how the American government is fundamentally structured... in a way where Republicans are free to obstruct everything ever. You and I both know that is what happens currently

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Enjoy watching flyover people suffer. I'm sure it nourishes you.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Slinging abuse isn't changing the situation I described.

Democrats are leaving red states. This will make it more difficult for Democrats to sustain majorities in the House and Senate. Democrats may be deliberately useless at enacting nationwide legislation (trying to coast on ACA 15 years later is pathetic), but Republicans are eager to impose their will nationwide.

Democrats can treat this as the threat it is or not. Given their history, I'm guessing not. Becoming abusive and following me into other threads because my predictions hurt your feelings hasn't changed anything I described. Time is running out whether you admit it or not. Now hurl more insults.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dude you are the weirdo here. I didn't follow you anywhere, you are all the fuck over Lemmy ranting and raving about Democrats

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

So you have yet to address what I've said. You're not here to participate in discussion. You're just here to lob insults and abuse.

I'm no longer going to participate in this discussion, since you can't approach anyone to your left with anything other than self-righteous hostility.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the one which was the only significant effort to improve American healthcare ever. The one the dreaded democrats tried to make better and Republicans destroyed. Yes, that one. Thanks for recognizing that

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I've made my prediction. You can watch it happen or not.