this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)

Canada

9621 readers
969 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's such a liberal thing to do it based on income instead of it being universal. I still haven't heard a good reason.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

While I agree universal would've been better, the cutoff is 90k. That's something like 80% of the population who qualify, and the top 20% can probably afford it.

In practice, is it really that different than universal with a raise in taxes on the wealthiest 20%?

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

90k isn't the wealthiest 20%.....

EDIT I stand corrected https://www.statista.com/statistics/484838/income-distribution-in-canada-by-income-level/

But still waiting for an actual good reason.

And not to mention the drug plan only covers 2 types of drugs.