this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
858 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to start a competitor to Spotify or Google music, you will have to pay those fees making it almost impossible for you to compete.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A company giving special access to it's competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

I hadn't considered it from a "collusion" angle.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it would be different if it was for all it's competition.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn't need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

This could definitely be collusion, but I don't think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Microsoft didn't make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.