this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
266 points (98.2% liked)

Selfhosted

46411 readers
960 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Different use cases.

It's not like your uploading and downloading gigabytes to it to use ffmpeg. For that you use something local. This is for converting smaller files conveniently. For example from a laptop and you don't want to use a public converter that might keep the content.

If you regularly convert certain file types on a computer, dedicated programs tend to be better than these combo ones anyway.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Why would anyone setup and maintain a server to do infrequent conversions of small files?

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In addition to the other post...

You already have a setup and throwing one more docker on isn't a big deal. especially if you have watchtower already setup as well... then it even updates itself.

I use tools like this all the time... PDF for example stirling-pdf makes doing something things a LOT easier than firing up a "proper" pdf editor. This tool would likely be the same concept for other workflows.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I love Stirling PDF. I use it probably once a quarter on average. But it's always there, ready to be useful.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

As do I.. had a coworker message me about using adobe to merge/split pdfs... rather than walking them through the adobe workflow, just linked them right to the url... It's so easy to use that I didn't have to say anything more. they got it in seconds that would have taken me minutes of back and forth to explain to them.

It's great. Simple tools for simple purpose.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because otherwise you need to maintain it on everyone of your computers and phone and everytime you wipe them and in every virtual machine you make and the developpers would need to maintain a version for every operating system that exists and they always forget to make a version for BeOS so that sucks

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely confused about the use cases you all seem to have. When are you sitting in a field on your phone trying desperately to convert a .avi to a .mkv?

For desktops you just need to have ffmpeg or handbrake or ImageMagick installed - there's nothing to "maintain". Image conversion is as simple as convert test.jpg test.png.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I’m genuinely confused about the use cases you all seem to have. When are you sitting in a field on your phone trying desperately to convert a .avi to a .mkv?

I worked IT for a newspaper back when they were more relevant. The satelite offices and in-field work had a surprising amount of problems like that.